New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Computers Sculpt Hopping Gelatinous Robots

These bloblike bots have been optimized for speed

Diagrams show cross sections of a gelatinous block-shaped robot as it appeared at various stages of automatic design

Amanda Montañez

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most robots are designed by human engineers, who must painstakingly arrange every joint and artificial muscle to make the bot accomplish a specific task. The process is slow and limited by human imagination; having an algorithm do it instead could “help usher in the world of bespoke robotics,” says computer scientist Josh Bongard of the University of Vermont. In a new study, he and his colleagues used feedback-based algorithms to design a variety of bloblike walking robots in record time. The results were published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

Each robot began as a digitally simulated brick of a gelatinous substance with 64 holes randomly interspersed throughout, like a block of Swiss cheese. It also contained 64 randomly placed artificial muscle patches that, when flexed, caused nearby parts of its body to stretch and constrict. At first, the simulated block simply jumped in place. But as the algorithm tweaked the muscle locations, as well as the holes' locations and sizes, the block began to hop forward. Nine versions later the holes had coalesced to sculpt a few stubby “legs,” which had become lined with muscle. The resulting digital bot could travel half its body length each second—and the entire design process, which the team repeated 100 times, took just 30 seconds on a laptop.

“The big contribution is the way they achieve all this in a very short time, with a very limited number of iterations,” says Cecilia Laschi, a mechanical engineer at the National University of Singapore, who studies soft robots but was not involved in the new study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers cast one of the designs in silicone, making a physical creature about half the size of a bar of soap. For muscles, the scientists affixed tiny bladders that could be flexed by pumping in pulses of air. The robot walked slower than the simulation—half a body length per minute—but significantly faster than a random design.

These movement-maximizing adjustments were guided by a type of optimization algorithm called gradient descent. This technique, which powers most machine-learning algorithms, finds optimal solutions to problems with an unwieldy number of variables. In this case, those variables were muscle locations, as well as hole locations and sizes. The algorithm repeatedly modified them strategically so the system improved with each iteration.

The team used the same technique to design virtual bots with other aims, such as transporting or launching an object. Next they hope to create more sophisticated machines that use sensors to interact with the world.

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Efficient Automatic Design of Robots,” by David Matthews et al., in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 120; October 3, 2023

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe