Computers Sculpt Hopping Gelatinous Robots

These bloblike bots have been optimized for speed

Diagrams show cross sections of a gelatinous block-shaped robot as it appeared at various stages of automatic design

Amanda Montañez

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most robots are designed by human engineers, who must painstakingly arrange every joint and artificial muscle to make the bot accomplish a specific task. The process is slow and limited by human imagination; having an algorithm do it instead could “help usher in the world of bespoke robotics,” says computer scientist Josh Bongard of the University of Vermont. In a new study, he and his colleagues used feedback-based algorithms to design a variety of bloblike walking robots in record time. The results were published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

Each robot began as a digitally simulated brick of a gelatinous substance with 64 holes randomly interspersed throughout, like a block of Swiss cheese. It also contained 64 randomly placed artificial muscle patches that, when flexed, caused nearby parts of its body to stretch and constrict. At first, the simulated block simply jumped in place. But as the algorithm tweaked the muscle locations, as well as the holes' locations and sizes, the block began to hop forward. Nine versions later the holes had coalesced to sculpt a few stubby “legs,” which had become lined with muscle. The resulting digital bot could travel half its body length each second—and the entire design process, which the team repeated 100 times, took just 30 seconds on a laptop.

“The big contribution is the way they achieve all this in a very short time, with a very limited number of iterations,” says Cecilia Laschi, a mechanical engineer at the National University of Singapore, who studies soft robots but was not involved in the new study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers cast one of the designs in silicone, making a physical creature about half the size of a bar of soap. For muscles, the scientists affixed tiny bladders that could be flexed by pumping in pulses of air. The robot walked slower than the simulation—half a body length per minute—but significantly faster than a random design.

These movement-maximizing adjustments were guided by a type of optimization algorithm called gradient descent. This technique, which powers most machine-learning algorithms, finds optimal solutions to problems with an unwieldy number of variables. In this case, those variables were muscle locations, as well as hole locations and sizes. The algorithm repeatedly modified them strategically so the system improved with each iteration.

The team used the same technique to design virtual bots with other aims, such as transporting or launching an object. Next they hope to create more sophisticated machines that use sensors to interact with the world.

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Efficient Automatic Design of Robots,” by David Matthews et al., in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 120; October 3, 2023

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe