New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Conductors Hear It All

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To do their job well, Kurt Masur and his colleagues must be able to hear amid a sea of sound when a single musician in a large orchestra hits a bad note. And in fact a paper in today¿s Nature suggests their brains have adapted to the task: conductors can localize sounds in their periphery better than either pianists or non-musicians.

Researchers from Magdeburg and Hannover in Germany gave seven classical-music conductors, seven pianists and seven non-musicians a unique hearing test. They placed three loudspeakers in front of them and three to their sides. In random order, the speakers then played a range of standard sounds, but occasionally the scientists mixed in deviant noises. The subjects were asked to press a button whenever a deviant sound came from one particular speaker. According to measurements of their brain activity and error rate, all three groups were equally good at identifying deviant sounds from a designated central speaker. Only the conductors, however, could reliably pinpoint deviant sounds from a particular peripheral speaker.

The same brain areas were active in all three groups, suggesting that conductors do not use different groups of nerve cells for this task. But people normally turn their heads to the source of a sound they find interesting. "Thus, everybody, even a non-musician, is quite good at separating sound sources right in front," says Thomas Muente, the lead author of the study. Conductors, though, have a whole orchestra around them, arranged in a semicircle. "They are forced to extend auditory attention to the periphery," Muente adds. Constant training seems to improve that ability.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe