Conservationists Decry U.S. Move to Not Penalize Hunter Who Killed Famed Wolf

The Utah hunter mistakenly shot and killed a gray wolf that had gained an international following for being the first of its kind seen at the Grand Canyon in 70 years

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Laura Zuckerman

July 10 (Reuters) - Conservationists on Friday protested a U.S. decision not to prosecute a Utah hunter who mistakenly shot and killed a gray wolf that had gained an international following for being the first of its kind seen at the Grand Canyon in 70 years.

The wandering wolf, a radio-collared female from Wyoming nicknamed "Echo," was celebrated last fall after being spotted in and around the national park in Arizona before a Utah coyote hunter reported in December that he had shot and killed the wolf after mistaking it for a coyote.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is illegal to kill wolves without a special permit in the Lower 48 states where most are protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Wolves in just two states, Idaho and Montana, are not on the federal list of endangered and threatened species and can be legally hunted.

A probe by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the U.S. Justice Department found that the hunter did not violate federal or state laws by mistakenly killing the wolf.

The Endangered Species Act makes it a crime for anyone to knowingly violate the law, including provisions that prohibit harassment, harm or death of protected animals. But officials said in a statement that the shooting of Echo resulted from misidentification, and was not intentional.

Michael Robinson, conservation advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity, criticized the decision and the policy of requiring proof a person knew the animal harmed or killed was protected.

"That's a standard that is almost impossible to meet and it leaves a lot of endangered animals very vulnerable," he said.

Authorities have not released the name of the Utah coyote hunter. Hunting regulations in Utah and elsewhere require sportsmen to properly identify targets before seeking to harvest them.

State wildlife officials said on Friday they were tweaking a hunting program to help sportsmen distinguish between wolves and coyotes, which may be shot on sight in Utah and much of the nation.

Echo was one of two protected gray wolves in the southern Rockies that have been shot and killed in recent months by coyote hunters.

The Fish and Wildlife Service has said testing confirmed an animal killed in Colorado in April was the first confirmed gray wolf in the state since 2009. That hunter also said he thought the wolf was a coyote and immediately informed wildlife officials of his mistake, authorities said. (Reporting by Laura Zuckerman in Salmon, Idaho; Editing By Cynthia Johnston and Sandra Maler)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe