Conservationists Identify Marine Biodiversity "Hotspots"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Image: ¿Science/PHOTO BY CALLUM ROBERTS

Conservation-oriented parks and reserves are fairly common on land, but comparatively few marine regions receive protection from human activities. This situation has, for the most part, elicited little concern, owing to the widely held belief that the large geographic ranges of most marine species would ensure their survival. But new research on restricted-range marine life¿that is, species limited to small areas¿challenges that idea, identifying 10 regions where further damage to coral reefs could lead to a series of extinctions. According to the authors of a study published today in the journal Science, conservation efforts directed at these so-called hotspots could prevent such extinctions and preserve marine biodiversity.

The researchers, led by Callum Roberts of the University of York, analyzed the geographic distributions of 3,235 different species of reef fish, coral, snail and lobster. More than a quarter of the fish and snail species and more than half of the lobsters have restricted ranges, they report. (Only 7.2 percent of the corals appear to have restricted ranges, but the investigators caution that they may well have underestimated coral biodiversity.) Taking these results into consideration along with those of a previous study, the team identified the ocean's most threatened reefs and pinpointed the 10 biodiversity hotspots. Although these areas comprise only 0.012 percent of the oceans, they harbor 34 percent of restricted-range species. The researchers note that the Philippines and the Gulf of Guinea are the top two hotspots. Some of the areas might be best served by joint protection plans, as eight of the 10 marine hotspots adjoin terrestrial ones. In these cases, the authors prescribe an extension of conservation efforts from land to sea.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American