Conservationists Identify Marine Biodiversity "Hotspots"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Image: ¿Science/PHOTO BY CALLUM ROBERTS

Conservation-oriented parks and reserves are fairly common on land, but comparatively few marine regions receive protection from human activities. This situation has, for the most part, elicited little concern, owing to the widely held belief that the large geographic ranges of most marine species would ensure their survival. But new research on restricted-range marine life¿that is, species limited to small areas¿challenges that idea, identifying 10 regions where further damage to coral reefs could lead to a series of extinctions. According to the authors of a study published today in the journal Science, conservation efforts directed at these so-called hotspots could prevent such extinctions and preserve marine biodiversity.

The researchers, led by Callum Roberts of the University of York, analyzed the geographic distributions of 3,235 different species of reef fish, coral, snail and lobster. More than a quarter of the fish and snail species and more than half of the lobsters have restricted ranges, they report. (Only 7.2 percent of the corals appear to have restricted ranges, but the investigators caution that they may well have underestimated coral biodiversity.) Taking these results into consideration along with those of a previous study, the team identified the ocean's most threatened reefs and pinpointed the 10 biodiversity hotspots. Although these areas comprise only 0.012 percent of the oceans, they harbor 34 percent of restricted-range species. The researchers note that the Philippines and the Gulf of Guinea are the top two hotspots. Some of the areas might be best served by joint protection plans, as eight of the 10 marine hotspots adjoin terrestrial ones. In these cases, the authors prescribe an extension of conservation efforts from land to sea.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American