Construction of Furnaces

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a paper read before the British Society of Arts, by Charles Sanderson, upon the sub, ject of Iron, he says, as regards the construction of furnaces, that generally speaking, they should have an internal form favorable to the gradual reduction and diminution of the volume of materials charged, which it is important should be so mixed that the earthy matter of the ore and the flux may readily unite j the descent of the materials into the furnace is regulated by the inclination and width of the boshes, and necessarily this inclination or width varies according to the nature of the ore which is to be melted— those which are most easily reduced require the boshes to be most inclined, while those which are difficult of reduction, and consequently require to be subjected to the action of the carbon of the fuel and the gases which are generated, for a longer period, are retained in this part of the furnace by greatly increasing its width, and giving the b08hes a greater inclination. In explaining this action of the blast-furnace, he showed how the metal is reduced and carbonized, from which it will appear how difficult it is to obtain a pure meLI, became, as it'hecomes developed in the lower regions of the furnace, it is necessarily mixed with substances formiug a variety of metalloidsj besides which, it is mechanically associated with the slag, which protects itin the dam from the oxydizing influence of the blast, through which it descends, carrying also with it a mixture of unreduced matter, which, from its gravity, becomes more or less mixed with the metal when it is in a state of pig-iron.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 49This article was published with the title “Construction of Furnaces” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 49 (), p. 392
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08141858-392

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe