"Continuous Motor" Underlies Long-Term Memory Storage

The constant activity of an enzyme first produced during learning traps memories in our brains

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An enzyme in the brain that behaves like a "continuous motor," constantly strengthening the connections between neurons, appears to be behind long-term memory storage.

The chemical, protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ), is part of a family of over 500 kinase enzymes, most of which transmit outside information into nerve cells.

"Most of these motors are in an inactive state, like an engine in a car that's parked," says Todd Sacktor, a professor of neurology at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center in New York City. "You have to turn it on by pressing the accelerator; as soon as you take your foot off the accelerator, it stops." But unlike its other family members, PKMζ, which was discovered in 1993, is synthesized when a memory is formed and then "essentially has no controls" and functions continuously, as if it had no "off" switch.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sacktor, along with Reut Shema and Yadin Dudai, neurologists at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, set out to determine what would happen if they blocked the enzyme at different intervals after a rat performed a learning task, in this case the recollection of eating an unappetizing meal. Their findings, published in this week's Science: they could erase those memories any time after a rat learned to avoid the unsavory snack by injecting a PKMζ inhibitor called ZIP into a midbrain region, the insular cortex (or insula)—home of the taste-processing gustatory cortex.

There are receptors for neurotransmitters (chemicals that transmit messages between brain cells) in the synapses (spaces) between neurons. PKMζ drives more receptors for the neurotransmitter glutamate, which is linked to learning and memory, to go into the synapse, thus strengthening their connection. "ZIP is a jam that stops the motor from enhancing synaptic strength," Sacktor says, "so, synapses go back to their normal strength and the memory is lost."

The researchers offered the rats water laced with the sugar substitute saccharin. They then gave their subjects an injection that induced nausea—causing the animals to develop a prominent aversion to saccharin-doped water. Afterward, regardless of when ZIP was administered, the rats forgot their saccharin-water intolerance within two hours of receiving the drug. Further, none of the rodents given ZIP (after developing an aversion to the sweetened water) recovered their memory over the course of the 25-day study. The rats could, however, relearn their distaste for the water if put through the drill again.

"I would say it's probably closer to the complete wiping," Sacktor says about the action of ZIP, indicating that it likely destroys all taste memory in the gustatory cortex. "We're erasing the contents of the hard disk … within two hours you could learn that association all over again and keep it."

Sacktor believes that this finding could one day be harnessed to help counteract the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder and to dampen the pain sensation. "Chronic pain is believed to be a strengthening of synapses in the pain pathways, so this could be a treatment for that," he says. "There is no treatment currently."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe