New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Controversial Telescope Set to Begin Construction in Hawaii

The Thirty Meter Telescope project has faced years of legal challenges over planned Mauna Kea site

An artist’s concept of the giant primary mirror of the Thirty Meter Telescope.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Construction of the controversial Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) is set to resume in Hawaii on 15 July after a four-year delay. The project has faced legal challenges and protests over its plans to build the mega-telescope atop Mauna Kea, a mountain that is sacred to Native Hawaiians.

With a major court battle now behind the project, “the day for construction to begin has arrived”, said Hawaii governor David Ige on 10 July.

Astronomers have designed the TMT as part of the next generation of ground-based observatories, joining two other enormous telescopes that are under construction in Chile. TMT officials previously estimated the project’s cost at US$1.4 billion, but that number has almost certainly risen given the delays.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first attempt to begin constructing the TMT, in April 2015, was halted almost immediately by protesters who say that building the telescope on Mauna Kea would further desecrate the mountain, which is already home to 13 astronomical observatories. In December 2015, Hawaii’s supreme court revoked the TMT’s construction permit and sent the project to Hawaii’s Board of Land and Natural Resources, which oversaw a second permit process and more public hearings.

Unsure whether they could build in Hawaii, project leaders began considering an alternate site in the Canary Islands. But in October 2018, the state’s supreme court ruled that the telescope’s second construction permit was valid, opening the way for work to restart on Mauna Kea.

One set of TMT opponents filed a fresh legal challenge this week in a lower court in Hawaii, saying the state has not acquired a security bond as financial protection to cover the costs of restoring the site if the project is not completed.

Another group, the Hawaii Unity and Liberation Institute, issued a 10 July statement that said, “we will forever fight the TMT…we are prepared for intense and lengthy struggles but stand firm in kapu aloha—peace and nonviolence”.

The access road that leads up Mauna Kea—the site of many of the 2015 protests—will be closed starting on 15 July.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 11, 2019.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe