Cooked Results: Modern Toolmaker Uses Fire to Solve 72,000-Year-Old Mystery

Archaeologists in South Africa have uncovered the earliest evidence of humans using pyrotechnology to shape their stone tools

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Arrowheads and other Stone Age tools may not look like much to the untrained eye, but try making them yourself and you'll find out just how difficult it can be.

After struggling for years to replicate stone blades excavated in the southern tip of Africa, modern toolmaker Kyle Brown—like early humans before him—stumbled upon the missing ingredient: fire.

Most archaeologists have thought that humans developed pyrotechnology—the controlled use of fire—in Europe about 25,000 years ago. But Brown's discovery, published in Science today, pushes that date back to at least 72,000 years ago—and possibly as far as 164,000.

The new findings complement other discoveries, like shell beads and ochre pigments, revealing advanced technical capabilities in the earliest modern humans, who emerged between 150,000 and 200,000 years ago.

Beginning in 2006 Brown, a doctoral student at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, began hunting for stone outcrops that had the same silcrete (a hard material formed from dissolved silica) found in tools excavated from archaeological sites at Pinnacle Point. He and his colleagues made some 10 trips to the field, lugging the heavy rocks back to the lab and smashing them to try to recreate the stone blades. "I had a pretty high failure rate," he says. The stone never flaked off properly, and the tools he made were larger and thicker than the ancient tools. "We reached a point that we covered the landscape fairly well and we weren't finding any suitable rocks," he says.

The team, however, had recently excavated silcrete tools that had a glossy luster to them and looked a lot like heat-treated Native American tools they had seen before. In 2007 the researchers had also found a large hunk of silcrete embedded in ash. "Out of desperation," Brown says, "I put the materials in a fire." He buried them in a sand, built a fire on top, raised the temperature to 300 degrees Celsius over a period of about eight hours, and then cooked them for another eight. When he pulled the materials out of the sand, the rock flaked off easily, and had a glossy sheen that matched the silcrete artifacts.

Brown, 36, grew up in San Francisco and got his start making stone tools as a teenager. His father, a field biologist, took him on ecological studies in California's Napa Valley where he collected volcanic glass and tried to copy the arrowheads he found in the region. "I wasn't much good at that," he admits. Years later, as a student at the University of California, Berkeley, a toolmaker gave him instruction and he was hooked.

Now, Brown has something to teach the rest of us, something that earlier Homo sapiens figured out tens of thousands of years ago.

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe