New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Copper and Tin Mixtures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The best mode of mixing the component metals of t!,is alloy appear* to be tt meiteach separately, and then to add the tin to the copper at the lowest stiniiu; 'ettipeiature. To complete the combination, the alloy" is again melted very gradually by glueing the metal in tiie crucible almost as soon as lh- iir? is lighted. The hardness of this allov. compared with toe extreme softness oi' the metals, ya'es us an example of the chemical changes effected by their combination. Thus, the I speculum metal, as used by Lord Rosse, is to- i tally devoid ot malleability, and from its hardness cannot be acted on by the file. His speculum consisted of lour atoms of chemical combining proportions of copper to one of tin; or, by weight, 126 4 copper to S8'9 tin. This alloy, which is a true chemical compound, is oi a brilliant white bistre, its specific gravity i-rSli, nearly as hard as steel, and almost,as j brittfeas 6eii!in*-wax. The: speculum is 6j feet in diameter 5 inches thick.. It was east open, grouti'l with, emery, placed on a table in a cistern filled with water at a temperature of 55 Fah., polished with red oxide of iron, procured by precipitation from green vitriol, or sulphate of iron, by water of ammonia.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 44This article was published with the title “Copper and Tin Mixtures” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 44 (), p. 345
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07161853-345

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe