Coral Reefs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At a recent meeting of the Boston Natural History Society, as reported in the Traveler, Professor Agassiz, gave an account of his recent visit to the reefs of Florida, and explanations of coraline growths. He estimates the rate of coral growth to be only a few inches in a century, a tenth or a twelfth part less than has been hitherto supposed ; and, supposing the reef rises from a depth of twelve fathoms, he would calculate its age upon its arrival at the surface of the water to be about twenty-five thousand years, and the total age of the four distinct concentric reefs of the southern extremity of the peninsula to be one hundred thousand years. Professor William B. Rogers said that the physical conditions could not have differed much in that region a hundred thousand years ago from what they now are, and consequently that such a calculation could reasonably be made upon the data accumulated by Professor Agassiz. Dr. D. F. Weinland annihilated such speculations by stating that, while in Hayti, he had noticed branches of some kinds of corals from three to five inches above the water, which must have grown that much during the short winter of three months, when the water was high. His observations went to prove that some kinds of corals were more rapid in their growth than is generally believed to be the case.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 37This article was published with the title “Coral Reefs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 37 (), p. 296
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05221858-296

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe