New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Corn Disrupts Caterpillars' Digestion to Protect Itself

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A variety of plants respond to attacks from herbivorous pests by synthesizing substances that deter their visitors from further feasting. Now scientists have discovered a new, fast-acting form of self-defense that some strains of corn use to defend against caterpillars attempting to feed on them. The findings, published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could help researchers better protect corn crops from hungry invaders.

Tibor Pechan of Mississippi State University and colleagues studied a strain of corn resistant to attacks from fall armyworm caterpillars (see image) and southwestern corn borers in order to determine its mechanism of defense. The key, they determined, was the production of a unique enzyme known as 33-kDa, which the plants manufacture within an hour of an attack. Caterpillars reared on corn that produces the enzyme grew to only half the size of caterpillars fed strains that don't manufacture 33-kDa. Using electron microscopy, the researchers studied the affected insects and determined that the enzyme interferes with the membrane that lines their stomachs. According to the report, the membrane is "the caterpillar's first line of defense" so the disruption compromises the caterpillar's ability to absorb nutrients and renders it more susceptible to toxins and pathogens. In a second test, the scientists genetically engineered plants to express excess 33-kDa and observed results that were even more pronounced. Caterpillars raised on the GM plants were only a quarter of the size of their counterparts raised on regular corn. Because 33-kDa has no effect on the human digestive system, the researchers posit that the approach "may have applications in agricultural biotechnology."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe