Coronavirus News Roundup: January 9–January 15

Here are pandemic highlights for the week

A mask on the floor of a hallway at the U.S. Capitol on January 7, 2021, the day after a mob of Trump supporters broke into the building.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The items below are highlights from the free newsletter, “Smart, useful, science stuff about COVID-19.” To receive newsletter issues daily in your inbox, sign up here.

Vaccine (and masking) lessons can be drawn from the reported SARS-CoV-2 infections among three members of Congress who sheltered in a crowded room among unmasked colleagues during the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol, writes Ben Guarino at The Washington Post (1/13/21). All 3 representatives had received just one of their two-dose shots against the virus — one member received it on Dec. 29 while the other two received it on Jan. 4, Guarino reports. The two vaccines being administered in the U.S. require two doses to confer their full protection. “Early protection against COVID-19 may occur from about 12 days after dose one,” a Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health physician and epidemiologist is quoted as saying. People “should not really consider themselves protected until after a week or two following dose two,” he adds.

Most people who recover from COVID-19 still have at least one symptom six months later, according to a study published (1/8/20) in The Lancet and covered the same day by Elizabeth Cooney at STAT. The study is based on interviews with about 1,700 COVID-19 patients discharged from a hospital in Wuhan between January and May 2020. Some subjects also underwent tests of their lungs, blood, and overall health. Nearly two-thirds of the patients said they still had fatigue and muscle weakness, Cooney reports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A few small studies are finding that most if not all pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 in their third trimester pass neither the virus nor antibodies to it to their newborn infants. Ariel H. Kim and Lauren L. Zhang covered two of the studies (one published 12/22/20 in JAMA Network Open and one in Cell the same day) for The Harvard Crimson (1/8/21).

I haven’t found any coverage yet but I suspect that some people on immune-suppressing drugs, which are often prescribed for people with transplanted organs or to treat an autoimmune disease, will be encouraged by results described in this 1/7/21 press release from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The release describes research published 1/5/21 in Clinical Infectious Diseases suggesting that when hospitalized for COVID-19, people on these drugs fare no worse on average than do people not taking them. The researchers now are studying whether outcomes vary for people on specific types of these drugs, the release states.

In the context of the novel coronavirus, more infectious disease experts are refocusing on the strong connection between “the health of nature, wildlife, and humans,” writes Jim Robbins for Kaiser Health News (1/4/21). Experts call this a One Health approach or concept, and they want governments to factor it into policies, Robbins reports. As humans move into more of Earth’s natural environments, more spillovers of animal diseases into humans are expected. “The spillover of animal, or zoonotic, viruses into humans causes some 75% of emerging infectious diseases,” Robbins writes.

You might enjoy, “Here’s how time works in 2021,” by Eli Grober in McSweeney’s.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe