Correspondence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A Typographical Error Corrected To the Editor of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN: I notice that you published my communication of January 14th. I feel much indebted for your kindness, but 1 beg to be allowed to call attention to an error, undoubtedly typographical, in which 11 (eleven) appears instead of 44 (forty-four). My authority for this value of 44 (forty-four) hours for the mean interval which elapses between a solar outburst and the terrestrial response is Svante Arrhe-nius, while he again ascribes it to Ricco. An exposition of this matter by Prof. Arrhenius may be found in the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN SUPPLEMENT for January 11th, 1908, No. 1671. WILFRID S. GRIFFIN. Pittsfield, Mass., February 16th, 1909.

SA Supplements Vol 67 Issue 1732suppThis article was published with the title “Correspondence” in SA Supplements Vol. 67 No. 1732supp (), p. 202
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03131909-170csupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe