Cortex Implants Considered

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A paralyzed man with an implant in his brain was able to operate a television, play a simple video game and flex a robotic hand using only his thoughts, researchers reported in July. They say such devices hold long-term promise for restoring function to paralyzed individuals. But a review of other neural prosthetics indicates that for now, less invasive techniques may provide the same abilities at less risk.

Two years ago a surgeon inserted a 16-square-millimeter, pincushionlike array of electrodes (right) into the motor cortex of 26-year-old Matthew Nagle, whose spinal cord had been severed by a knife wound to the neck. The implant protrudes from the skull and links via a cable to a computer. While connected, Nagle crudely directed an on-screen cursor as he envisioned it moving in various directions. He functioned with the implant for nearly a year. A second recipient had much less consistent control, but two others have shown results similar to Nagle’s, according to neuroscientist John Donoghue of Brown University, who led the experiments and is chief scientist for the marketer for the system, Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems in Foxborough, Mass.

The system could complement existing technology that allows paralyzed people to control a computer through EEG (brain-wave) electrodes on the scalp, Donoghue says, but other investigators do not see the point. “What was achieved could have been done with something off the shelf,” says neurobiologist Miguel Nicolelis of Duke University, who is experimenting with fully implantable electrodes, which would presumably carry less risk of infection than a device that extends from the skull. And “if you can get the same function without putting something into the brain, you’d prefer to do that,” adds neurologist Jonathan Wolpaw of the Wadsworth Center in Albany, N.Y., which is testing a home EEG system. Implanted electrodes, he says, are years away from practical use.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Cortex Implants Considered” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 5 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1006-9b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe