New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cosmic-Level Anxiety

Scientific American Space & Physics, February/March 2022

Scientific American Space & Physics, February/March 2022

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On this past Christmas Day, NASA scientists and engineers cheered and breathed a cautious sigh of relief for the first time in, likely, years. The James Webb Space Telescope launch had gone off successfully, after years of delay, budget overages and technical challenges. In the ensuing weeks, the anxiety has kept up a steady hum while the telescope performed crucial early mission tasks to get itself situated to start collecting data—namely, unfurling its sunshield and mirrors. Read Alexandra Witze’s update outlining these accomplishments. The telescope’s operators are far from relaxing, but each mission milestone marks the start of a new era of astronomy, as Richard Panek reports in this issue (see “The James Webb Space Telescope Has Launched: Now Comes the Hard Part”).

NASA has another exciting mission underway: the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART). Designed as part of our planetary defense plan (see “NASA’s DART Mission Could Help Cancel an Asteroid Apocalypse”), a test spacecraft launched at the end of last November and will smash into its target sometime in the fall of 2023. I anticipate many months of thrilling anxiety for NASA scientists. If all goes well, the payoffs will be cosmic.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 5 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Cosmic-Level Anxiety” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 5 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022022-3Xr5ZyAOUJh63pfpiZMD3M

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe