New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cosmic Rays May Threaten Space-Weather Satellite

DSCOVR’s computer may be suffering from radiation-induced glitches, months after it became the primary sentinel for incoming solar storms

DSCOVR monitors space weather from a perch about 1.5 million kilometres from Earth.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A US space-weather satellite that is supposed to alert Earth to incoming solar storms has temporarily dropped offline five times in the year since it became operational. Its onboard computer may be experiencing hiccups caused unexpectedly by galactic cosmic rays.

The Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) went out of action most recently on October 11. In each case, it unexpectedly entered a ‘safe hold’ in which scientific data stopped flowing and engineers had to scramble to try to recover the spacecraft. In total, DSCOVR’s space-weather forecasting instruments have been offline for more than 42 hours since 28 October 2015, when the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) took the spacecraft over from NASA, which built and launched it.

Each outage lasts for only a few hours, and the total downtime amounts to 0.48% of its time in space—well below NOAA’s requirement that the spacecraft operate at least 96% of the time. The October 11 outage did not significantly affect predictions of a minor geomagnetic storm that arrived a few days later, says Robert Rutledge, head of the forecast office at NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, Colorado.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But the outages mean that DSCOVR could be offline when a major solar storm erupts, leaving Earth essentially blind to the incoming onslaught. ”Are they problematic? Yes,” says Douglas Biesecker, a solar physicist at the Boulder centre.

Storm warning

Other heliophysics spacecraft monitor solar eruptions, but DSCOVR delivers unique information from its location at the gravitationally stable L1 point, about 1.5 million kilometres from Earth in the direction of the Sun. The spacecraft's instruments directly measure the speed, magnetic field and other properties of the charged particles streaming off the Sun. Those data translate into better forecasts of what could happen when a solar storm hits Earth, such as disruptions to satellite electronics or fluctuations in electrical power grids.

DSCOVR is NOAA’s main tool for forecasting space weather, but it began life as Triana, a NASA Earth-observing spacecraft built in the late 1990s to gaze constantly at the planet. A pet project of Al Gore, then the US vice-president, Triana was shelved in 2001, then repurposed in 2008 for NOAA’s space-weather needs. “It was never designed from the beginning to be a space-weather satellite,” says Steven Clarke, head of NASA’s heliophysics division in Washington DC.

The satellite launched on February 11, 2015 and experienced its first outage four months later, when its onboard computer spontaneously rebooted. On average, the safe holds happen every 74 days, but two came just eight days apart. They are not correlated with solar storms.

A NASA internal review board convened to study the problem could not definitively pinpoint the cause, but concluded that it was most likely to be galactic cosmic rays randomly striking the spacecraft, causing high-energy ionization that reboots the computer. The computer, which was built by NASA in 2000, contains a processor card that is similar to those flying aboard many other missions and is meant to withstand the radiation hazards of deep space.

Knowledge gap

NOAA does have a back-up data stream, from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft that is also orbiting the L1 point. That was the primary source of solar-wind data until NOAA forecasters switched to DSCOVR in July. But ACE is 19 years old, and intense solar storms can swamp its forecasting instruments, causing problems when data are needed the most.

NOAA has requested an extra US$1.5 million from Congress to improve how it handles DSCOVR data, including its responses to the outages. The satellite is supposed to last until 2022, when a follow-up mission is slated for launch. Historically, NOAA has cobbled together its space-weather observations where and when it could, but the US government is starting to demand a more coherent approach. On 13 October, President Barack Obama signed an executive order that, among other things, requires NOAA to “ensure the continuous improvement of operational space weather services”.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on October 28, 2016.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe