New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cougars Are Returning to Midwest After 100 years

Cougars are returning to the U.S. Midwest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cougars (Puma concolor) have not lived in Oklahoma, Missouri and other states around the Midwest since the beginning of the 20th century. Now the cats are returning to and repopulating some of their former Midwestern habitats, according to research published in June by the Journal of Wildlife Management.

Cougars once lived throughout most of the U.S. and Canada, but state-sponsored bounties put in place to protect livestock and humans from what were often deemed “undesirable predators” led to the cats' extermination in eastern North America and the Midwest. By the second half of the 20th century they were mostly restricted to states and provinces west of the Rocky Mountains.

Things started to turn around for the cougar in the 1960s and 1970s, when, one by one, states rescinded the bounties and made the animals a managed-game species. They have now been seen in Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, Illinois and several other U.S. states and Canadian provinces in and around the Midwest, and the sightings are growing more frequent, according to the new paper.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The expansion has been driven by the cougars' solitary, territorial nature, explains the paper's lead author, Michelle LaRue, research fellow for the Polar Geospatial Center at the University of Minnesota. “When a female cougar has males, they have to disperse away from where they were born,” she says, which prevents the males from inbreeding with their female relatives and helps them to avoid conflicts with older, more powerful males. LaRue and her fellow researchers examined 178 confirmed Midwestern cougar sightings from 1990 to 2008. These included carcasses, as well as scat and tracks, along with camera and video evidence. The number of confirmed sightings during this period increased steadily each year, from two animals in 1990 to 34 in 2008. By comparison, the total population of cougars in North America is estimated at around 30,000 animals. Of the 56 carcasses, 76 percent were male, typical of the gender's role as the primary dispersers of the species.

LaRue says this trend is probably just the beginning of cougars recolonizing the Midwest. “Now we can start asking more questions: Where are they going to end up, how many are they going to be and how are they going to interact with their ecosystems?” LaRue and her co-authors suggest that wildlife professionals begin to think “about public awareness campaigns in areas likely to encounter dispersing cougars” because people in these Midwestern states are not used to living with large predators.

Adapted from the Extinction Countdown blog at blogs.ScientificAmerican.com/extinction-countdown

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/sep2012

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Howdy, Neighbor” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 3 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0912-24b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe