Could a Special Diet Replace Chemotherapy?

For patients with blood cancer or in need of a bone marrow transplant, the amino acid valine could hold answers to new treatments

Steve Gschmeissner, Science Source

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Blood cancer treatments may one day include special dietary restrictions: researchers have found that an essential amino acid plays a crucial role in the creation of blood stem cells—a discovery the scientists say could lead to a potential alternative to chemotherapy and radiation.

Valine is one of 10 essential amino acids—protein building blocks that are crucial to life but cannot be made by the human body. It must therefore be obtained through diet and is found in protein-rich foods such as meat, dairy and legumes. Valine is involved in metabolism and tissue repair, and now it also seems key to the formation of blood stem cells. As reported in Science, researchers at the University of Tokyo and Stanford University found that human blood stem cells failed to proliferate when cultured in petri dishes without valine. Mice deprived of the amino acid for two to four weeks also stopped making new red and white blood cells.

Based on these results, senior author Hiromitsu Nakauchi and his colleagues think that depriving blood cancer patients of dietary valine before a bone marrow transplant might spare them the necessity of chemotherapy or radiation—both of which destroy cancer-causing blood stem cells to make room for transplanted ones but carry health risks. In a follow-up experiment, Nakauchi and his colleagues put the idea to the test in valine-restricted mice and were able to successfully transplant bone marrow without needing radiation or chemotherapy. But half of the mice died from a lack of valine shortly after the four-week trial ended.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nakauchi says it will take much more research to determine how long people can tolerate a valine-free diet (which would likely be supplied intravenously). But if the deprivation works in humans, it could open up the possibility of bone marrow transplants for some patients—such as pregnant women or people with low blood counts—who are usually not considered candidates for chemotherapy or radiation, says Linheng Li, a stem cell biologist at the Stowers Institute for Medical Research in Kansas City, Mo., who was not involved in the work. He suspects that this approach will need to be combined with other therapies or smaller doses of chemo and radiation to be effective, though.

Removing valine from the diet of certain leukemia patients could also potentially eliminate the cells that are the cause of their cancers in the first place, Nakauchi says: “If such a simple and relatively less harmful therapy could be used to treat leukemias, that would be great.”

Karen Weintraub is a staff writer at USA Today, where she covers COVID, vaccine development and other health issues.

More by Karen Weintraub
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Could a Special Diet Replace Chemotherapy?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0117-14

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe