Could an Epilepsy Drug Prevent Alzheimer's?

Decreasing brain activity improves memory in people with early dementia

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Years before a person is disabled by Alzheimer's disease, the memory problems of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) start causing difficulty in daily life. Research published in May in Neuron suggests that a drug currently used for epilepsy might improve sufferers' cognition—and perhaps even slow the progression of the disease—by quieting activity in the hippocampus.

Past research has found that people with MCI have an overactive hippocampus, the brain region associated with memory function. Whether this activity causes memory impairment or is the brain's way of compensating has been a matter of debate, but the new work suggests that the increased activity is indeed the culprit behind memory loss.

In the study, researchers gave 17 people with MCI an antiepilepsy drug called levetiracetam. “There had been studies showing that this drug was particularly effective in this piece of the brain,” explains Michela Gallagher of Johns Hopkins University, who led the study. The drug reduced activity in the patients' hippocampus and, more important, improved their performance on a memory test.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gallagher thinks that the drug might even slow or stop the decline into Alzheimer's. Higher levels of neural activity are linked to a faster buildup of amyloid-beta protein, which is the hallmark “plaque” of Alzheimer's pathology. If levetiracetam can suppress hippocampal activity, it might slow plaque deposition and thus slow the disease's progression—a hypothesis that Gallagher is eager to test next.

SA Mind Vol 23 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Could an Epilepsy Drug Prevent Alzheimer's?” in SA Mind Vol. 23 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0912-16a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe