New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Could Heat Waves Be Forecast 3 Weeks Out?

A large-scale atmosphere circulation system has been found to signal a greater chance of an extreme heat later

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists studying US climate models have identified an atmospheric circulation pattern that signals a higher risk of extreme heat spells. The pattern's occurrence indicates only that a US heat wave is more probable than usual, but it does so 2–3 weeks in advance — a major step beyond the 10-day reach of current forecasting technology.

Previous research has attempted to link US heat waves to tropical conditions such as sea surface temperatures or the strength of the Asian monsoon. But a study published today in Nature Geoscience finds a strong link to a mid-latitude air-circulation pattern, known as ‘wave number 5’, in which five major high-pressure and five low-pressure zones, spaced thousands of kilometers apart, encircle the globe.

Because extreme heat waves happen only once every few years, the researchers turned to computer climate models to look for signals that foreshadow a severe hot spell. Led by Haiyan Teng, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, the scientists examined 2,300 heat waves from 12,000 years’ worth of simulated US weather. “The really great thing is that they were able to leverage those model runs to get good statistics,” says Siegfried Schubert, a meteorologist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is collaborating with Teng and her team on a related project.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The analysis revealed that major heat waves were four times more likely to develop after a strong wave number-5 system formed at mid-latitudes. Teng says that this particular pattern can stagnate, leading to slow-moving high-pressure zones that can produce prolonged heat.

Still, even when a wave number-5 system is present in the atmosphere, the overall risk of a US heat wave is still small, she adds. Any given summer day in the United States has a 1.5% chance of being part of a heat wave. The existence of a strong wave number-5 pattern increases the chances of a heat wave to only 6% — not enough to allow meaningful warnings.

The next step toward eventually producing that kind of advance forecast is to pinpoint the conditions that create wave number-5 patterns, says Schubert. Another valuable research direction would be to identify similar atmospheric signals for heat waves that strike Europe and Asia, he adds.

Upmanu Lall, a hydro climatologist at Columbia University in New York, says that the work is a nice counterpoint to his own research to identify large-scale atmospheric conditions that can produce flooding. Lall sees a need for more work that bridges the gap between weather forecasting and climate research, with the ultimate goal of producing long-term warnings of extreme weather events.

Advance warnings of heat waves would be especially useful in large cities, says Marshall Shepherd, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Georgia in Athens. “Heat waves can be particularly amplified in urban areas,” he says. “If you had a couple of weeks notice, you could mobilize cooling stations and adjust resources to mitigate mortality and morbidity,” and power companies could plan for increased demand driven by air-conditioner use.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on October 27, 2013.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe