Could It Be That James Bond’s Martinis Were Shaken Because He Had Alcoholic Tremor?

Fiction's most famous spy seems to have had a major substance abuse problem

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Bombed. James Bombed.

That slight revision to Secret Agent 007's famous self-introduction may be in order. A study of James Bond's personal habits, as described in the original series of books by Ian Fleming, finds that Bond drank a lot—way more than is safe. He had a license to kill the entire bottle.

In fact, Bond imbibed so much alcohol that he would be at high risk for “malignancies, depression, hypertension, and cirrhosis,” according to the report in the BMJ, preabbreviatedly known as the British Medical Journal. The Liver and Let Die analysis appeared in the BMJ's infamous Christmas issue, which annually includes the kind of tongue-in-cheek studies that are best conceived after a few drinks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


English emergency physician Graham Johnson of Derby and pediatrician Patrick Davies of Nottingham divvied up the 14 Flemings to perform their study. Nottingham hepatologist Indra Neil Guha was brought in for liver expertise. They sought no funding for the work because “the original books were already owned by two of the study authors.” They describe the setting, ordinarily a lab or research medical center, as “the study authors' homes, in a comfy chair.” (I'm guessing each home had its own comfy chair, rather than the one chair being shuttled between the domiciles.) They also note that they sought no consent from the study participant, “the barrier to this chiefly being his fictional nature meaning he is unable to give valid consent.”

Johnson and Davies's alcohol assay calculated that Bond drank more than four times the recommended maximum for adult beverages. He sucked down an average of some 92 units per week (a unit being 10 milliliters or eight grams of pure ethanol). That average doesn't include days during which he was absolutely incapable of acquiring alcohol—for example, while hospitalized. He also could not drink when incarcerated while some fiend created a Rube Goldberg device to kill him instead of taking the expedient and effective blammo route.

Such drinking habits make accidents a major extra risk. For example, the researchers count that during one dinner with his nemesis Auric Goldfinger, Bond had 18 units before somehow driving himself safely home.* “Despite his alcohol consumption,” the study authors write, “he is still described as being able to carry out highly complicated tasks and function at an extraordinarily high level. This is likely ... pure fiction.”

Speaking of complicated tasks performed at a high level, the research team wondered whether, after years of Bond's chronic alcohol abuse, “he would realistically have the capacity to perform (in all aspects of his life).” To make clear their meaning, the authors then referred to a 1987 paper entitled “Sexual Dysfunction in Male Alcohol Addicts: Prevalence and Treatment,” published in Archives of Sexual Behavior. It seems that most of Bond's alleged conquests may have turned into mere cuddles: the books should have been called The Spy Who Almost Loved Me, From Russia with Love but the Tennis Kind, and, of course, Dr. Oh No.

(Despite such ample evidence that Bond might have had erectile dysfunction, his randy reputation inspired a 1999 Saturday Night Live sketch in which he received a doctor's diagnosis of 107 concurrent sexually transmitted diseases, of which only 53 had been previously identified.)

One clue left by Fleming that Bond had indeed done irrevocable damage to himself through alcohol overindulgence is his famous vodka martini instruction: “shaken, not stirred.” The BMJ study authors note that “ideally vodka martinis should be stirred, not shaken. That Bond would make such an elementary mistake in his preferences seemed incongruous with his otherwise impeccable mastery of culinary etiquette.”

The researchers thus theorize that Bond suffered from alcohol-induced tremor, aka the shakes—if he prepared his own martini, he was unable to stir it without also shaking it. Thus, to hide his infirmity, which could obviously jeopardize his career within Her Majesty's Secret Service, he resorted to making and ordering all his martinis shaken. So that M's faith in him would not be.

* (4/28/14): This sentence was edited after posting to correct an error. The original stated Bond had imbibed 18 drinks before driving home.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 3This article was published with the title “007 and 7” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 3 (), p. 84
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0314-84

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe