Counting on Your Brain to Keep Score

Researchers pinpoint the neurons responsible for figuring out how things add up

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ever wonder how it is your brain adds things up? Well, according to a new study there is a set of cells in the top rear of the brain that apparently keeps score. A team of Duke University researchers report in PLoS Biology that they discovered a pocket of "accumulator neurons" in the region of a monkey brain called the parietal cortex that appears to integrate and sum up the total quantity of individual items.

"It's akin to having a jar full of M&Ms and being asked how many of them are in there," says lead study author Jamie Roitman, a neuroscientist at the University of Illinois at Chicago (having moved over from Duke). Identifying the neurons that make these rapid-fire approximations, she adds, provides "a better grasp on the actual functions that underlie our higher cognitive abilities."

Researchers zeroed in on this region of the brain because previous human studies indicated that damage to the intraparietal portion of the brain impairs numerical processing. While two macaque monkeys performed visual and numerical tasks, the researchers monitored the activity of neurons there. A screen in front of the monkeys flashed a series of dot groupings consisting of two, four, eight, 16 and 32 dots. For each set of 100 trials, one of the groupings was made the standard, and that number would appear half of the time. If there were eight dots in the standard set, for example, when they came up, the monkeys were rewarded with a little juice; they would get a whole load of juice if any other cluster flashed on the screen.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After trials featuring each dot grouping as the standard, the researchers found that the subjects' parietal neurons did not show extra activity even if the monkeys expected a sweeter reward (as a result of viewing a nonstandard cluster). "The amount of reward didn't matter [to these neurons]," Roitman says, "it was how many dots were in the array."

Within the intraparietal regions, they did find a group of neurons that routinely became more excited when a higher number like 32 was flashed and then reacted in lower bursts as numbers decreased. A second set of neurons reacted in exactly the opposite way, decreasing their activity with increasing value. Essentially, Roitman says these neurons appear to be working together to make an approximation of total quantity. "They didn't identify the numerical number of the stimulus," she explains. "No neurons [for instance] preferred four or eight."

Roitman speculates that an estimate fed by these intraparietal neurons is then passed to another population of cells in the prefrontal cortex, which then fine-tunes the calculation into an exact value. This portion of the cortex, according to Roitman, is part of the association cortex that connects planning and attention with motor functions. "When this part of cortex is disrupted," as the result of a stroke or brain injury, she says, "the deficits that follow are difficulties in allocating attention."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe