New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cunning Owls Bait Beetle Prey

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The wise old owl is a staple of nursery rhymes. New findings provide more evidence that the animals are, in fact, quite crafty. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, owls use mammal dung to lure prey.

A few examples of avian tool use have been reported, but in many cases the birds were captive animals and it was difficult to assess the advantage their wild counterparts could glean from the behavior. In the new work, Douglas J. Levey of the University of Florida and his colleagues studied wild populations of burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia). The researchers removed all traces of mammal dung from the nests of two owl populations in Gilchrist County, Fla. Half of the nests then received an amount of dry dung typically found surrounding a nest. After four days, the researchers analyzed the birds¿ droppings and collected discarded remains of eaten beetles to determine the owls¿ diets. They discovered that owls with access to dung ate 10 times more dung beetles than those with bare nests did.

The scientists also tested whether the owls might be using the dung to mask the scent of their nests, but found that it did not offer sufficient protection from predators. Instead, the owls appear to ¿fish¿ for dung beetles using excrement as bait. The results of this study, the authors conclude, provide ¿an unambiguous estimate of the importance of tool use in a wild animal.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe