New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Curiosity Rover Zeroes In on Traces of Past Habitats on Mars

At 10:31 P.M. Pacific time on August 5, NASA's Curiosity rover will begin the first direct search for habitable environments on Mars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All science begins in a star trek mode: go where no one has gone before and discover new things without knowing in advance what they might be. As researchers complete their initial surveys and accumulate a long list of questions, they shift to a Sherlock Holmes mode: formulate specific hypotheses and develop ways to test them. The exploration of Mars is now about to make this transition. Orbiters have made global maps of geographic features and composition, and landers have pieced together the broad outlines of the planet's geologic history. It is time to get more sophisticated.

Our team has built the Mars Science Laboratory, also known as the Curiosity rover, on the hypothesis that Mars was once a habitable planet. The rover carries an analytic laboratory to test that hypothesis and find out what happened to the early clement environment we believe the planet had. Loosely defined, a habitable environment has water, energy and carbon. Past missions have focused on the first requirement and confirmed that Mars had—and occasionally still has—liquid water [see “The Red Planet's Watery Past,” by Jim Bell; Scientific American, December 2006]. Those missions have also seen hints of geochemical gradients that would provide energy for metabolism. But none has seen carbon in a form potentially suitable for life.

Like the twin Viking landers of the mid-1970s, Curiosity carries a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer capable of sensing organic compounds, whether biological or abiological in origin. Unlike Viking, however, Curiosity is mobile and is touching down in a far more promising site. More important than finding carbon itself, the mission aims to discover how to conduct the search. Even on Earth, we are not entirely sure how to trawl the deep geologic record for preserved biosignatures. Paradoxically, the very characteristics that make so many environments habitable—water, oxidants, and chemical and temperature gradients—also tend to destroy organic compounds. Paleontologists have learned to seek the rare circumstances that facilitate preservation, such as geochemical conditions that favor very early mineralization. Silica, phosphate, clay, sulfate and, less commonly, carbonate are all known to entomb organics as they precipitate. Orbiters have made maps of some of these minerals at Curiosity's landing site, which will guide its perambulations.

MORE TO EXPLORE

Mars 3-D: A Rover's-Eye View of the Red Planet. Jim Bell. Sterling, 2008.

Beyond Water on Mars. John Grotzinger in Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, pages 231233; April 2009.

Paleoclimate of Mars as Captured by the Stratigraphic Record in Gale Crater. R. E. Milliken, J. P. Grotzinger and B. J. Thomson in Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Article No. L04201; February 19, 2010.

Mars Science Laboratory Web site: http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl

Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Curiosity Rover Zeroes In on Traces of Past Habitats on Mars” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072012-44npUzuBIuqID4k6ybCvkv

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe