Curiosity Rover Zeroes In on Traces of Past Habitats on Mars

At 10:31 P.M. Pacific time on August 5, NASA's Curiosity rover will begin the first direct search for habitable environments on Mars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All science begins in a star trek mode: go where no one has gone before and discover new things without knowing in advance what they might be. As researchers complete their initial surveys and accumulate a long list of questions, they shift to a Sherlock Holmes mode: formulate specific hypotheses and develop ways to test them. The exploration of Mars is now about to make this transition. Orbiters have made global maps of geographic features and composition, and landers have pieced together the broad outlines of the planet's geologic history. It is time to get more sophisticated.

Our team has built the Mars Science Laboratory, also known as the Curiosity rover, on the hypothesis that Mars was once a habitable planet. The rover carries an analytic laboratory to test that hypothesis and find out what happened to the early clement environment we believe the planet had. Loosely defined, a habitable environment has water, energy and carbon. Past missions have focused on the first requirement and confirmed that Mars had—and occasionally still has—liquid water [see “The Red Planet's Watery Past,” by Jim Bell; Scientific American, December 2006]. Those missions have also seen hints of geochemical gradients that would provide energy for metabolism. But none has seen carbon in a form potentially suitable for life.

Like the twin Viking landers of the mid-1970s, Curiosity carries a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer capable of sensing organic compounds, whether biological or abiological in origin. Unlike Viking, however, Curiosity is mobile and is touching down in a far more promising site. More important than finding carbon itself, the mission aims to discover how to conduct the search. Even on Earth, we are not entirely sure how to trawl the deep geologic record for preserved biosignatures. Paradoxically, the very characteristics that make so many environments habitable—water, oxidants, and chemical and temperature gradients—also tend to destroy organic compounds. Paleontologists have learned to seek the rare circumstances that facilitate preservation, such as geochemical conditions that favor very early mineralization. Silica, phosphate, clay, sulfate and, less commonly, carbonate are all known to entomb organics as they precipitate. Orbiters have made maps of some of these minerals at Curiosity's landing site, which will guide its perambulations.

MORE TO EXPLORE

Mars 3-D: A Rover's-Eye View of the Red Planet. Jim Bell. Sterling, 2008.

Beyond Water on Mars. John Grotzinger in Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, pages 231233; April 2009.

Paleoclimate of Mars as Captured by the Stratigraphic Record in Gale Crater. R. E. Milliken, J. P. Grotzinger and B. J. Thomson in Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Article No. L04201; February 19, 2010.

Mars Science Laboratory Web site: http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl

Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Curiosity Rover Zeroes In on Traces of Past Habitats on Mars” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072012-44npUzuBIuqID4k6ybCvkv

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe