New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Custom-Designed Proteins Could Counteract Chemical Weapons

Computational design of new enzymes could lead to cheap and efficient degradation strategies for chemical warfare agents that we have not seen yet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Custom-designed proteins made with the aid of computers could fight chemical weapons such as nerve gas and help decontaminate toxic-waste sites, scientists say.

In recent years, computer design of proteins has made great leaps forward, developing molecules with new kinds of structures and properties. However, few efforts have been made to incorporate metals into these computationally designed molecules. Metals are key, highly reactive parts of many proteins—for instance, the iron in the blood-protein hemoglobin helps it transport oxygen inside our bodies.

Now, researchers have used computers to design a protein containing zinc that can degrade molecules similarly to sarin gas, a weapon of mass destruction created by Germany during World War II that attacks the nervous system.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Body's Own Molecules Being Customized to Fight Cancer]

"The ability to computationally redesign metal sites in proteins opens up a number of opportunities to use metal ions for performing new and useful reactions of human interest — for example, degrading chemical toxins and synthesizing new drug molecules,"  researcher Sagar Khare, a computational biologist at the University of Washington, told InnovationNewsDaily.

The scientists first analyzed about 150 known zinc-containing enzymes. This research helped them identify 12 with shapes they could redesign for new reactions.

Sarin is a type of molecule known as an organophosphate, which also includes many pesticides and pollutants found in toxic-waste sites, which authorities are eager to treat. Since nature has not had time to come up with catalysts that can efficiently break down these relatively new compounds, "we decided to see if we could speed up the process," Khare said.

One of the new enzymes, a redesigned mouse protein, broke apart an organophosphate similar to sarin about 10 million times more effectively than its original counterpart.

"This was a proof-of-principle effort, and the designer enzyme was not developed against actual nerve agents," Khare said. "However, because the method is completely general, it should be possible to use it for developing antidotes and decontamination agents."

One goal of improving computational design of new enzymes "is to have the capability to come up with degradation strategies for new chemical warfare agents that we have not seen yet: readily, efficiently and cheaply," Khare said. "The next steps are to develop catalysts for actual nerve-agent degradation, and extend these methods to the degradation of other environmental toxins."

Khare, along with David Baker and their colleagues, detailed their findings online Feb. 5 in Nature Chemical Biology. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Copyright 2012 InnovationNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe