Custom-Designed Proteins Could Counteract Chemical Weapons

Computational design of new enzymes could lead to cheap and efficient degradation strategies for chemical warfare agents that we have not seen yet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Custom-designed proteins made with the aid of computers could fight chemical weapons such as nerve gas and help decontaminate toxic-waste sites, scientists say.

In recent years, computer design of proteins has made great leaps forward, developing molecules with new kinds of structures and properties. However, few efforts have been made to incorporate metals into these computationally designed molecules. Metals are key, highly reactive parts of many proteins—for instance, the iron in the blood-protein hemoglobin helps it transport oxygen inside our bodies.

Now, researchers have used computers to design a protein containing zinc that can degrade molecules similarly to sarin gas, a weapon of mass destruction created by Germany during World War II that attacks the nervous system.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Body's Own Molecules Being Customized to Fight Cancer]

"The ability to computationally redesign metal sites in proteins opens up a number of opportunities to use metal ions for performing new and useful reactions of human interest — for example, degrading chemical toxins and synthesizing new drug molecules,"  researcher Sagar Khare, a computational biologist at the University of Washington, told InnovationNewsDaily.

The scientists first analyzed about 150 known zinc-containing enzymes. This research helped them identify 12 with shapes they could redesign for new reactions.

Sarin is a type of molecule known as an organophosphate, which also includes many pesticides and pollutants found in toxic-waste sites, which authorities are eager to treat. Since nature has not had time to come up with catalysts that can efficiently break down these relatively new compounds, "we decided to see if we could speed up the process," Khare said.

One of the new enzymes, a redesigned mouse protein, broke apart an organophosphate similar to sarin about 10 million times more effectively than its original counterpart.

"This was a proof-of-principle effort, and the designer enzyme was not developed against actual nerve agents," Khare said. "However, because the method is completely general, it should be possible to use it for developing antidotes and decontamination agents."

One goal of improving computational design of new enzymes "is to have the capability to come up with degradation strategies for new chemical warfare agents that we have not seen yet: readily, efficiently and cheaply," Khare said. "The next steps are to develop catalysts for actual nerve-agent degradation, and extend these methods to the degradation of other environmental toxins."

Khare, along with David Baker and their colleagues, detailed their findings online Feb. 5 in Nature Chemical Biology. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Copyright 2012 InnovationNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe