New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cute and Ugly Pygmy Lorises Are Actually Two Different Species

It turns out there are two species of mysterious, venomous pygmy lorises

A large-eyed loris sits on a tree branch.

Likely Xanthonycticebus intermedius

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Wide-eyed, arboreal lorises—small mammals that secrete flesh-rotting venom to use in vicious territorial fights—are among the planet's strangest primates. And because they live in trees and are nocturnal, they are exceptionally difficult to study. “I've gone out for 10 nights in a row and not seen any,” says American Museum of Natural History conservation biologist Mary Blair.

In fact, there's so little information available, Blair says, that “every time somebody looks at lorises, they find something new”—even a new species. Discovery of primate species is especially rare because the group tends to be well studied, she notes. For a new study in Genes, she and her colleagues report their finding that the pygmy loris species is actually two: a lankier species with a longer muzzle primarily found in southern Vietnam, southern Laos and Cambodia (which retains the name Xanthonycticebus pygmaeus) and a fuzzier, button-nosed species in northern Vietnam, northern Laos and southern China, now called X. intermedius.

X. intermedius was first proposed as a separate species in 1960 by zoologist Dao Van Tien, but his idea was discounted because of a specimen mix-up. Others continued to suspect two distinct species, however. In 2016, for example, a pet trader in Japan told Oxford Brookes University conservationist Anna Nekaris, who co-authored the new study, that pygmy lorises came in two types—“ugly” and “cute”—and that his customers preferred the “cute” ones.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers' genetic analysis finally validated these observations. Rather than scouring the jungles for wild lorises, the team extracted DNA from 41 museum specimens in Vietnam and the U.S. Sequencing these samples showed that northern and southern pygmy lorises are distinct species whose most recent common relative lived 1.2 million years ago.

Today's lorises, cute as some are, number among few known venomous mammals; to fight, they lick special inner-elbow glands for poisonous oil that fills grooves in their teeth. Pygmy lorises were already listed as endangered, and the species split reveals a greater threat to each individual population. “The distribution of these species is much smaller than before,” says Truong Nguyen, a zoologist at the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, who was not involved in the study. “Therefore, we have to do more to conserve them.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe