Cutting Off Blood Supply to Fat Cells Slims Obese Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With 65 percent of the U.S. population overweight, the battle of the bulge seems to be one we are losing. Now researchers have unveiled a new method of attack: starving fat cells of their lifeblood in order to destroy them. Findings reported in the June issue of Nature Medicine indicate that the tactic is successful in mice.

A team lead by Wadih Arap and Renata Pasqualini of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center borrowed a technique from the fight against cancer to develop their antiobesity therapy. One approach to killing tumors is to cut off their blood supply because the proliferation of new cells requires the formation of new blood vessels, a process known as angiogenesis. Although fat cells are not malignant, they do have the ability to proliferate and expand. In addition, each cell is in contact with a number of capillaries. In the new work, the researchers identified a protein, called prohibitin, which is expressed on blood vessels that supply fat cells in obese mice. The team then paired a peptide that binds to prohibitin with a second peptide that promotes cell death.

Obese mice treated with the compound lost 10 percent of their body weight each week over the course of a four-week study without signs of toxicity. "Because prohibitin is also expressed in blood vessels of human white fat," the authors conclude, "this work may lead to the development of targeted drugs for treatment of obese patients."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe