Daguerreotyping

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


M. Niepce de St. Victor has presented a third memoir on Heliochrome, or sun color ing, to the French Academy of Sciences which we will give,in extenso, next week, as it contains much of interest to all Daguerre-otypists. It was mentioned by M. Arago, to the Academy, on the occasion, that it is not by contact, but in the camera, that M. Niepce operates, and that he obtains every color. He likewise noticed a very remarkable fact that M. Niepce has observed in his experiments, and to which he directed the study of philo sophers, namely, that the morning light has a much greater photogenic action than the even ing light. For example, if a prepared plate is exposed from nine o'clock till noon, in the camera, the colored impression will be ob tained in a much shorter time than if the same experiment were made from noon till three o'clock. Moreover, if the pictures are looked at by a strong light, M. Niepce not having yet found the means of fixing them completely, the colors become faint, bud this effect is very perceptible if it is morning, whilst it is almost nothing in the afternoon. At the close ot his remarks, M. Arago used these significant words—mdash;"M. Niepce has resolved the problem —mdash;nothing iurther remains for him to do but to perfect it by the permanent fixing of the colors."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 22This article was published with the title “Daguerreotyping” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 22 (), p. 172
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02121853-172f

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe