Dairy Farming Old and New

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Got milk? Although the drink is ubiquitous now, it is unclear when ancient farmers started utilizing their cattle for dairy products (as opposed to meat). Now findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that Britons were harvesting milk as early as 6,000 years ago. Meanwhile, the results of another new study indicate that current practices of cheese making could be improved by genetic engineering: cloned GM cows produce milk with potentially improved processing properties and heat stability.

Richard Evershed of the University of Bristol and his colleagues examined more than 950 broken bits of dirty dishes from 14 archaeological sites in Britain that date to the Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age for evidence of fat. By comparing the ratio of carbon isotopes in the molecules, the scientists identified whether the source of the residue was milk or meat. They found that pieces of pottery from each site held evidence of dairy consumption, though the ages of the milk-marked fragments varied from site to site. Their results, the authors conclude, "provide the first direct evidence, to our knowledge, that the exploitation of animals for milk was already an established practice at the time farming arrived in Britain in the late fifth millennium B.C."

The second study, published online by the journal Nature Biotechnology, hints at what the dairy farm of the future might look like. Gotz Laible and his colleagues at the Ruakura Research Center in Hamilton, New Zealand, altered cells from female dairy cows to include additional copies of two genes that govern production of casein, the predominant milk protein. The cells were fused with donor eggs and implanted in surrogate mothers. Of the 11 cloned cows that survived, nine yielded milk with elevated levels of two casein molecules. Specifically, the milk had eight to 20 percent more beta-casein and nearly twice as much kappa-casein as milk from regular dairy cows. These properties should speed up cheese manufacturing processes and increase their productivity. The authors conclude that "the magnitude of the observed changes highlights the potential of transgenic technology to tailor milk composition in dairy cows." This is the first time that scientists have modified cow's milk solely to improve its quality, instead of to manufacture proteins of pharmaceutical interest. It remains to be seen if the public will agree that milk from a cloned, GM-modified cow still "does a body good."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe