Dams over the Decades

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Construction of large dams in the U.S. mostly came to a halt in the 1970s. Many are now unsafe, inefficient or no longer needed, requiring removal—events that geologists and biologists alike will follow closely to observe how these unimpeded rivers and their wildlife respond.

by the numbers

538


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dams removed in the 90 years before 2005.

548

Dams removed from 2006–2014.

10 million

Cubic meters of stored sediment released on removal of two dams (64- and 32-meter-high structures) in Washington State last year, the largest release to date.

SOURCES: “1000 DAMS DOWN AND COUNTING,” BY J. E. O'CONNER ET AL., IN SCIENCE, VOL. 348; MAY 1, 2015 (dam removals); “THE REMAINS OF THE DAM: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM 15 YEARS OF US DAM REMOVALS?” BY GORDON E. GRANT AND SARAH L. LEWIS, IN ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL. 3. EDITED BY GIORGIO LOLLINO ET AL. SPRINGER, 2015 (sediment release)

Sarah Lewin Frasier is a senior editor at Scientific American. She plans, assigns and edits the Advances section of the monthly magazine, as well as editing online news, and she launched Scientific American’s Games section in 2024. Before joining Scientific American in 2019, she chronicled humanity’s journey to the stars as associate editor at Space.com. (And even earlier, she was a print intern at Scientific American.) Frasier holds an A.B. in mathematics from Brown University and an M.A. in journalism from New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She enjoys musical theater and mathematical paper craft.

More by Sarah Lewin Frasier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Dams over the Decades” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 1 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0715-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe