Dark Matter’s Elusiveness Means Search May Soon Become More Challenging

The search for dark matter is starting to go cold

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Since the 1980s physicists have deployed a string of increasingly advanced detectors in pursuit of something that ought to be ubiquitous but has proved devilishly hard to capture. Dark matter, the invisible stuff thought to make up a quarter of the universe, has yet to show in even the most sophisticated experiments.

Another blow befell the search last October, when the world's most sensitive detector of WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) came up empty. Dark matter may well be a WIMP, a ghostly particle that would interact with normal matter very infrequently, which is why at least 15 experiments around the globe are looking for the particles. But if those campaigns fail to hit particle pay dirt in the next few years, scientists may have to refocus the search and embrace alternative explanations for dark matter—some of which are less than appealing.

South Dakota's Large Underground Xenon (LUX) detector was the latest to take an unsuccessful swipe at WIMPs. Although WIMPs are elusive, occasionally one of the particles should collide with an atom inside LUX's 370-kilogram vat of liquid xenon, producing a detectable light signature. The researchers have seen nothing of the kind after three months, ruling out some possible characteristics for WIMPs, such as certain masses for the particles. By now more than half of the possible kinds of WIMPs that had been predicted have been eliminated, says LUX co-spokesperson Richard Gaitskell of Brown University.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The hopes of detecting dark matter are clouded by the possibility that it might not be a WIMP. Another candidate particle, the axion, would be much lighter than a WIMP and therefore more difficult to spot. “You don't hear about axions as much because it has proved somewhat harder to detect them,” says Stanford University physicist Peter Graham. Only one large-scale project is currently on the case.

An even thornier possibility is that dark matter only interacts with normal matter via gravity, meaning that snagging dark matter in a particle detector may be forever beyond our grasp. “That's the most pessimistic possibility, which we all hope it isn't,” Graham says.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Cosmic Dragnet” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 1 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0114-13

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe