Darkness Sharpens Hearing in Adult Mice

Rapid brain-cell changes in animals kept in the dark gave them better discrimination of sounds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Could being visually impaired have had a role in the musical genius of Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles? A study provides some clues by showing that adult mice kept in the dark quickly develop sharper hearing and become better at distinguishing pitch and frequency. The improvements were correlated with adaptations in the brain — such as strengthening of connections between neurons — that normally happen only early in life.

For their study, published today in Neuron, Hey-Kyoung Lee, a neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, and her collaborators selected two sets of healthy adult mice. They kept the first group in a darkened environment for a week, while the other was exposed to natural light. The team used electrodes to measure activity in neurons in the animals' primary auditory cortex — the part of the brain that processes what a sound is, how loud it is and where it comes from.

The researchers played sounds of different frequencies and intensities to the mice, and watched how their brain cells reacted. The results “showed that neurons in visually deprived animals can 'hear' much softer sounds” than in control animals, says Lee. “They also have much finer discrimination ability as far as identifying pitch goes.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous studies have found that changes in the auditory cortex take a long time, and that people who become blind early in life adapt better than those who lose their sight later. The team's findings, however, show that some modifications can occur rapidly in the adult brain, she says. “Moreover,” she adds, “the changes in the auditory cortex were achieved by changes in the strength of synaptic connections. These were believed to be unchangeable in adults.”

Sensory compensation
The results also provide some basis for the claim that visual impairment can aid musicians. “There's some evidence that if you don't have vision, you can locate sound better,” says Lee. But, she adds, studies on humans either use brain imaging — which does not get to the fine detail — or look at behavior. “We've looked at the level of neurons, and provided a cellular basis for how these functional changes happen at the behavioral level.”

The sensory changes in mice were temporary, but the findings could show researchers how to improve hearing in deaf people. “A lot of people are trying to recover their hearing through cochlear implants. They work very well in younger children, who recover perfectly,” Lee explains. “But adults who are completely deaf have a difficult time recovering their hearing even with these devices.” Brief periods of visual deprivation could help people learn to process sound after receiving implants, she says.

Study co-author Patrick Kanold, a biologist at the University of Maryland in College Park, notes that visual deprivation might not have the same effect on humans as on mice. “Future work will identify if such deprivations are effective in humans. For example, while one week of deprivation showed effects in mice, for humans longer deprivations might be needed,” he says.

The result “is somewhat surprising”, says Pawan Sinha, a neuroscientist studying vision at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. He adds that researchers have previously reported modest improvements in sound localization abilities in blind humans, but basic auditory thresholds seemed largely unaffected. “Evidence of sensory enhancement in blind humans is rather tentative.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on February 4, 2014.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe