Data Points: Feeling Terror, March 2005

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Feeling Terror

Fear of terrorism has made many Americans willing to curtail rights and sacrifice basic freedoms, according to a national survey of 715 respondents prepared by Erik C. Nisbet and James Shanahan of Cornell University for a December 2004 report.

Percent of respondents who think the federal government should:

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Have more power to monitor Internet activities: 47

Indefinitely detain suspected terrorists: 63

Outlaw some activities even if constitutionally protected: 36

Percent who say the media should not:

Cover protests: 33

Report criticisms of the government: 31

ATTITUDES TOWARD ISLAM: “Islam promotes violence.”

Percent who agree: 47

Percent of highly religious Christians who agree: 65

“Muslim-Americans should be forced to register their whereabouts.”

Percent who agree: 27

Among highly religious Christians: 42

“Mosques should be closely monitored.”

Percent who agree: 26

Among highly religious Christians: 34

SOURCE: Media & Society Research Group, Cornell University. Analyses involving religion included data only from Christians, agnostics and atheists. Degree of religiosity was based on self-identification, church attendance, and beliefs about Israel and a literal interpretation of the Bible.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American