Data Points: Deicing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Deicing

Antarctica has lost a significant amount of ice in the past few years, find Isabella Velicogna and John Wahr of the University of Colorado at Boulder. They used measurements taken from April 2002 to August 2005 by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). It consists of two orbiting satellites whose separation is affected by slight gravitational tugs caused by the shifting of mass on the earth's surface. The changes can be measured to an accuracy of one micron.

Percent of the earth's freshwater in Antarctica: 70


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Percent of the earth's ice in Antarctica: 90

Cubic kilometers of ice lost annually during study period: 152

In gallons: 40 trillion

Time needed by U.S. to consume that amount of water: 3 months

Resulting contribution to annual rise in sea level: 0.4 millimeter

Margin of error: 0.2 millimeter

Percent of total sea-level rise during study period accounted for by Antarctic melting: 13

SOURCE: Science Express, March 2

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Data Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 5 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0506-28a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe