New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points, June 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Girdled by Garbage

Discarded rockets, exploded satellites, paint flecks and even human waste contribute to the earth's orbital litter. The U.S. Space Surveillance Network tracks all man-made objects down to baseball-size fragments (10 centimeters wide). They pose a risk of serious collision with future space missions. According to a NASA analysis, even if humans stopped launching satellites now, debris will increase after 2055. That is when the formation of new pieces, resulting when larger ones break up, will exceed the rate of destruction by reentry burn-up.

Percent of orbital objects that are debris: 93


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Number of fragments at least 10 centimeters wide: 9,000

Combined mass, in kilograms: 5 million

Number of known orbital collisions, 1991–2005: 3

Number of collisions expected in the next 200 years: 18

Number of collisions expected to be catastrophic: 11

SOURCES: U.S. S trategic Command; Science, January 20, 2006

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Data Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 6 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0606-26a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe