Data Points, July 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

SAVE THE INSECTS

Dell Computer had $56 billion in sales during its last fiscal year. That amount, however, is less—by a billion—than the estimate of the value that bees, dung beetles and other insects bring every year to the U.S. economy. Cornell University entomologist Jon E. Losey and Mace Vaughan of the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation in Portland, Ore., made the first ever estimate of “services” provided by wild insects in a study that appeared in the April issue of the journal Bioscience—one that the authors acknowledge is “very conservative”—only a small fraction of the actual benefits furnished by creatures considered by many to be mere pests. Without insects, the authors note, human life on earth would eventually be extinguished.

Value of crop production from pollination by native insects: $3 billion


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Crop losses averted by beneficial insects from predation or parasitism of agricultural pests: $4.5 billion

Percent of native pests controlled by other insects: 65

Economic losses averted every year by burial of livestock waste by dung beetles: $380 million

Amount spent for hunting, fishing and observing wildlife that relies on insects as a food resource: $50 billion

Number of North American bird species that are primarily insectivores: 395

SOURCE: BioScience, April 2006

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Data Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-32a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe