New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points, July 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

SAVE THE INSECTS

Dell Computer had $56 billion in sales during its last fiscal year. That amount, however, is less—by a billion—than the estimate of the value that bees, dung beetles and other insects bring every year to the U.S. economy. Cornell University entomologist Jon E. Losey and Mace Vaughan of the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation in Portland, Ore., made the first ever estimate of “services” provided by wild insects in a study that appeared in the April issue of the journal Bioscience—one that the authors acknowledge is “very conservative”—only a small fraction of the actual benefits furnished by creatures considered by many to be mere pests. Without insects, the authors note, human life on earth would eventually be extinguished.

Value of crop production from pollination by native insects: $3 billion


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Crop losses averted by beneficial insects from predation or parasitism of agricultural pests: $4.5 billion

Percent of native pests controlled by other insects: 65

Economic losses averted every year by burial of livestock waste by dung beetles: $380 million

Amount spent for hunting, fishing and observing wildlife that relies on insects as a food resource: $50 billion

Number of North American bird species that are primarily insectivores: 395

SOURCE: BioScience, April 2006

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Data Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-32a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe