Spring Forward
The “doomsday clock” crept two minutes closer to midnight this past January, a visual cue that represents the increasing likelihood of global catastrophe. Scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project created the symbolic clock in 1947, which is maintained by the board of directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. For the first time, the board factored into its decision the dangers associated with climate change, in addition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons. —Thania Benios
Current doomsday time: 11:55 P.M.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Number of times in the clock's 60-year history that the minute hand has been wound:
Forward: 11
Backward: 7
Doomsday time in 1953 (closest ever to midnight): 11:58 P.M.
Doomsday time in 1991 (furthest from midnight): 11:43 P.M.
Number of nuclear warheads:
In the world: 27,000
In the U.S. and Russia: 26,000
That are launch-ready: 2,000
SOURCE: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists statement, January 17
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
