Data Points, November 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Live Fast, Die Young

Living fast is a rock ‘n’ roll cliché, and now scientists have quantified that speed. They analyzed the fates of European and North American musicians who became famous between 1956 and 1999, based on the artists' appearance in a 2000 poll of the all-time top 1,000 albums. The genres covered were rock, punk, rap, R&B, electronica and new age. Although the celebrities studied do not affect overall mortality statistics, the scientists worry that their risky behaviors could negatively influence their millions of fans.

Number of famous musicians studied: 1,064


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Number who died by 2005: 100

Median age of death of:

North American celebrity: 41.78

European celebrity: 35.18

Percent of deaths related to drug and alcohol use: 31

Risk of early death compared with general population (within first 25 years of fame): 1.7 times

SOURCE: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, October 2007

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Data Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 5 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1107-34a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe