New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points: Caffeine Fiends

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Caffeine boosts blood pressure in the short term, but habitual drinkers may not face the same risk. Researchers followed 155,594 American women over 12 years (from the ongoing Nurses Health Study) and found an inverted-J-shaped relation between high coffee intake and hypertension risk. Colas, however, demonstrated a linear correlation. Caffeinated soft drinks may harbor unidentified risk-boosting compounds, or perhaps the antioxidants in coffee protect the cardiovascular system.

Number in study who developed hypertension: 33,077

Number in the U.S. with hypertension: 50 million


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Percent change in relative risk when the daily intake of coffee was:

Less than 1 cup: 0

1 cup: 6

2–3 cups: 0

4–5 cups: −7 to −9

6 or more cups: −9 to −12

Percent change when the daily intake of cola was:

Less than 1 cup: 0

1 cup: 9 to 13

2–3 cups: 11 to 24

4–5 cups: 28 to 44

SOURCE: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 294; November 9, 2005. Data shown combine the results of two cohorts, which spanned slightly different periods.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Data Points: Caffeine Fiends” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012006-1bshZHPiCsoABSJRcZXtb3

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe