DATA POINTS: CANCER DEATHS

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The American Cancer Society reports a drop in total cancer deaths from 2002 to 2003, the first decrease since nationwide record keeping began in 1930. Total cancer deaths for 2006 are expected to rise because of the growing and aging population. The death rate, however, will continue its fall, which began in 1991.

Cancer deaths in 2002: 557,271

In 2003: 556,902


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Expected cancer cases in 2006: 1,399,790

Deaths expected from:

Lung cancer: 162,460

Colorectal cancer: 55,170

Breast cancer: 40,970

Prostate cancer: 27,350

Percent of all cancer deaths from these four types: 51

Odds of developing cancer by age 39:

Men: 1 in 70

Women: 1 in 50

Between ages 40 and 59:

Men: 1 in 12

Women: 1 in 11

Between ages 60 and 69:

Men: 1 in 6

Women: 1 in 9

SOURCE: Cancer Facts & Figures 2006.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 4This article was published with the title “DATA POINTS: CANCER DEATHS” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 4 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0406-32a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe