New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points: Collision Decision

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Design flaws caused a support structure for a magnet to fail during a stress test of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) on March 27. Built to be the world's most powerful particle accelerator, the LHC will smash lead ions into one another with energies of trillions of electron volts (TeV). Repairs may delay the LHC's target start date of November.

Circumference of LHC in meters: 26,659

Energy imparted to each proton in TeV: 7


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Total collision energy of lead-ion beams (consisting of many protons) in TeV: 1,150

Number of particles in each beam: 300 trillion

Odds that two particles will actually collide: 1 in 10 billion

Approximate power consumption in watts of: A household microwave oven: 1,100

The LHC: 120 million

Time it takes to defrost a pizza in: A household microwave oven: 6 minutes

The LHC: 7.6 femtoseconds (7.6x10–15 second)

SOURCES: CERN; DiGiorno's Microwave Rising Crust Four-Cheese Pizza. Pizza calculation is theoretical and assumes that the collision energy can be evenly distributed over the pizza.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Data Points: Collision Decision” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 6 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0607-36a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe