Data Points: Healthy Investing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In an aging U.S. in which the younger generation starts work later, maintaining the labor force means that people need to work well past the age of 65. A team led by Kenneth G. Manton of Duke University argues that the nation should dramatically increase research to boost longevity of the workforce and to lower age-associated health costs. Using economic and demographic data, the group has calculated ideal amounts for the U.S. to invest in biomedicine.

Projected U.S. population in 2034: 375 million

Number who will be 65 years or older: 75 million


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Optimal level of annual biomedical investment as a percent of gross domestic product: 12.8

Expressed as an amount in today's economy: $1.6 trillion

Current U.S. investment: $360 billion

Economic value of increased life span, 1970–2000: $95 trillion

Value after removing health care expenditures: $60 trillion

Annual percent decrease in disability for those 65 and older, 1982–2004: 1.5

Expressed as a number who did not become disabled: 2.7 million

Medicare dollars saved if trend continues to 2034: $810.2 billion

SOURCES: U.S. Census Bureau; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA online, June 15

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Data Points: Healthy Investing” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 2 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0807-29c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe