Data Points Hit or Miss

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On July 23, astronauts onboard the International Space Station (ISS) heaved out a 630-kilogram, refrigerator-size tank of ammonia and a 96-kilogram obsolete camera mounting. NASA frowns on littering in space but made an exception in this case because the pieces were too large to bring back on a shuttle mission (they will fall out of orbit in about a year and burn up). More dangerous are objects smaller than 10 centimeters wide, which are not tracked by ground stations. A one-millimeter–wide meteoroid can puncture an astronaut's suit. We asked Bill Cooke of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., and Mark Matney and Eric Christiansen of the NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston—all specialists in meteoroid and orbital debris impacts—to provide details about the possibility of collisions.

Impact speed in kilometers per second of:

Meteoroids: 12 to 72

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Debris: 5 to 15

Bullet from a handgun: 0.34

Size that is of concern:> 1 millimeter

Main altitude of circling debris in kilometers: 700 to 1,000

Altitude of ISS and space shuttle in kilometers: 300 to 400

Percent chance of impact with: Space debris: 0.12 to 0.2

Micrometeoroid: 0.08 to 0.13

Chance of losing a shuttle from an impact: 1 in 500 to 1 in 300

Metric tons per day of meteoroids entering Earth: 16.5

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American