Dead Stars Account for Some Dark Matter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nearly 70 years ago, astronomer Fritz Zwicky observed that clusters of galaxies do not hold enough visible stars to explain their rotation. He subsequently proposed that the missing mass in fact resides in the galaxies but does not radiate any light. Ever since then, however, the identity of this so-called dark matter¿which is estimated to account for about 95 percent of the mass of galaxies such as our own¿has eluded researchers. Findings announced today in the journal Science, however, are throwing light on the mysterious matter. According to the new study, as much as 35 percent of the dark matter in our galaxy may be composed of dead stars.

Scrutinizing digitized images of the southern sky, Ben R. Oppenheimer of the University of California at Berkeley and his colleagues discovered 38 previously unnoticed cool white dwarfs¿faint stellar remnants dating back some 10 to 13 billion years ago¿in a small portion of the halo of dark matter encircling the Milky Way. If this density of white dwarfs accurately reflects that of the rest of the halo, then they can account for at least 3 percent¿ and perhaps up to 35 percent¿of the galactic dark matter.

The significance of the new findings could be far-reaching. "This research is not just about white dwarfs and dark matter. It also has implications for the star formation history of the galaxy, probably even before the disk itself formed," team member Didier Saumon of Vanderbilt University remarks. "There is much to learn about how galaxies form, and about how stars form in the process, from studying this population of white dwarfs."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe