Deadly Dialogue

Healthy tissue may inadvertently call in tumors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

"What is it that decides what organs shall suffer a case of disseminated cancer?" asked London surgeon John Paget, exploring the deadly phenomenon of tumor metastasis in an 1889 edition of the journal Lancet. Cancer cells could spread with equal ease to any part of the body, he speculated, yet metastatic colonies seemed to favor certain organs, such as the lungs and liver. Paget imagined that the malignant cells might be like plant seeds that are carried by the winds in all directions but "can only live and grow if they fall on congenial soil."

To this day, scientists are trying to understand whether properties of the "seeds" or the "soil" determine where spreading tumors take root, and growing evidence suggests that both play important roles. Researchers in Japan have recently added intriguing details to that theory in a study that reveals how distant tumor cells interact with future sites of metastasis in the lungs through a signaling mechanism involved in immune responses to pathogens. The participation of this pathway may also offer a clue as to why certain organs seem more susceptible to metastases than others, according to senior author Yoshiro Maru of Tokyo Women's Medical University. "The lung is sensitive to microbes; it is a first defense," Maru explains. "So any stress, including the presence of cancer, might be recognized by organs responsible for host defense mechanisms. That is our guess."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American