Deadly Dialogue

Healthy tissue may inadvertently call in tumors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

"What is it that decides what organs shall suffer a case of disseminated cancer?" asked London surgeon John Paget, exploring the deadly phenomenon of tumor metastasis in an 1889 edition of the journal Lancet. Cancer cells could spread with equal ease to any part of the body, he speculated, yet metastatic colonies seemed to favor certain organs, such as the lungs and liver. Paget imagined that the malignant cells might be like plant seeds that are carried by the winds in all directions but "can only live and grow if they fall on congenial soil."

To this day, scientists are trying to understand whether properties of the "seeds" or the "soil" determine where spreading tumors take root, and growing evidence suggests that both play important roles. Researchers in Japan have recently added intriguing details to that theory in a study that reveals how distant tumor cells interact with future sites of metastasis in the lungs through a signaling mechanism involved in immune responses to pathogens. The participation of this pathway may also offer a clue as to why certain organs seem more susceptible to metastases than others, according to senior author Yoshiro Maru of Tokyo Women's Medical University. "The lung is sensitive to microbes; it is a first defense," Maru explains. "So any stress, including the presence of cancer, might be recognized by organs responsible for host defense mechanisms. That is our guess."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American