New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Deadly Heat Dome Was a 1-in-10,000-Year Event

The record-smashing temperatures in the Pacific Northwest last year were an extraordinarily rare occurrence even in the age of climate change

Residents cool off in the water at Sellwood Riverfront Park

Residents cool off at Sellwood Riverfront Park during a record-shattering heatwave in Portland, Oregon, on June 28, 2021.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The extreme heat that obliterated temperature records in the Pacific Northwest in 2021 will likely occur just once every 10,000 years.

Researchers from UCLA used multiple climate models to determine that the extraordinary heat disaster last year was a highly improbable event, even in the age of climate change. Previous studies suggested that the deadly heat wave, which killed about 800 people, had a probability of near zero.

“Accounting for the fact that things have gotten warmer, and even given the amount of warming we’ve seen in the region due to climate change, this event still came up as a highly, highly unusual event,” said Karen McKinnon, assistant professor of statistics and the environment at UCLA.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


She couldn’t name any other 10,000-year events.

The heat dome sat over the Pacific Northwest for several days in June 2021, smothering the region with temperatures that sometimes soared 30 degrees above normal.

It eclipsed previous highs by hitting 116 degrees Fahrenheit in Portland, Ore.; 107 F in Seattle; and 121 F in Lytton, British Columbia. All three readings set all-time records (Climatewire, June 29, 2021). Hundreds of people died in the oppressive heat, which can shut down human organs and exacerbate underlying conditions. A wildfire destroyed Lytton shortly after the heat wave.

But only a few degrees of those blistering temperatures can be blamed on climate change, McKinnon said, noting that large swings in temperature are not unheard of in the Pacific Northwest.

Summertime daily maximum temperatures in the region have increased by almost a half-degree Fahrenheit per decade since 1960, the UCLA study said.

“Mostly what we see is that this was an extreme event that happened in the climate system,” McKinnon said. But 30 degrees above normal for June “was more in the realm of bad luck rather than something that we are expecting to see a lot of due to climate change.”

UCLA researchers also looked at whether the extreme heat was a signal that climate models are having difficulty predicting temperatures under climate change. They didn’t find that climate change-influenced events are happening faster than researchers’ ability to predict what might come in the future, she said.

They also didn’t see evidence that the heat event was a harbinger “that extremes are gonna be changing faster than we would expect,” she said.

“That said, I really want to emphasize that this result does not mean that climate change is not influencing extremes,” McKinnon said.

Everything is getting warmer, she said, “and that makes heat waves more intense, more severe, longer.”

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2022. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe