Decaf Coffee Plants Developed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For many coffee lovers, their precious beverage comes with an unwanted ingredient: caffeine. As a result, processes have been developed to remove the compound, although current methods are expensive and sometimes compromise flavor. But scientists may have come up with a way to get decaffeinated coffee straight from the plant. Researchers report today in the journal Nature that their genetically modified coffee plants have 70 percent less caffeine than regular plants do.

Three enzymes are involved in making caffeine in coffee plants. Researchers at the Nara Institute of Science and Technology in Japan led by Shinjiro Ogita engineered seedlings of Coffea canephora in which expression of the gene controlling one of these enzymes--theobromine synthase, or CaMXMT1--was repressed. Compared with regular plants, leaves from one-year-old GM plants exhibited a 50 to 70 percent reduction in caffeine content. According to the report, "the transgenic plants described here should yield coffee beans that are essentially normal apart from their low caffeine content at maturity."

The scientists note that their technique could sidestep some of the problems of industrial decaffeination, in which solvents flush caffeine from the beans. Their next step is to apply their technique to C. arabica plants, which produce the high-quality Arabica coffee that accounts for 70 percent of the world market. Of course, it remains to be seen if java lovers will embrace "GM joe."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe