December 2007 Puzzle Solution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Orange juice, please" I said to my new friend after I told her my solution, "with a touch of vodka."

Solutions:

1. Because of Ron, there is nobody who has shaken hands with 8 others.
So, the numbers are:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, X, where X is the unknown number.
Every time two people shake hands, we’ll say that each of the two has done a "half-shake." Because each act of shaking hands increases the total count of all "half-shakes" by two and there is an even number of half-shakes without the X, X must be an even number.

Could X be 6? That is, could the shakes be:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 6

No, because 7 (we'll identify people with the number of half-shakes they do) must shake hands with everyone (including 1) and shake hands with 2. This eliminates 1 from shaking hands with either of the 6s. That implies that both 6s would have to shake hands with 2, but then the 2 would become a 3.

By contrast, the following is possible and is the best we can do:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7

7 shakes with 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6.
6 shakes with 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 7.
So, 1 and 2 are done.
5 shakes with 3, 4, 4, 6, 7.
Now 3 is done.
The 4s shake with one another.

Is 0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 possible?
No.
7 shakes with 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
6 shakes with 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.
So, both 2s are done.
This does not leave people for the 5s.


2. Before the last handshake, here was the situation:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7
Notice that everyone who had shaken at least 4 hands must have shaken hands with all others who had shaken at least 4 hands. That is, the 4s, 5s, 6s, and 7s had all shaken hands with one another. Therefore neither Caroline nor I could be among those, because we first shook hands after I resolved the second problem. Therefore, we must be among the 1, 2, 3. But Caroline shook more hands than I did, but I do not know how many unless I had shaken two hands before shaking hers. In that case, she has now shaken four hands.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe