Decision by the Commissioner of Patents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the matter of the application of Ira D. Warner for letters patent for improvement in Catarrhal Douche.—The applicant claims " a nasal douche, orsyringe, having a tube with reversed curves, S and C, substantially as described.'' The invention consists simply in giving a double curve to the tube so thatthe nasal ducts are readily reached, and, at the same time, the syringe and hand of the operator are removed from the front of the mouth, where they would obstruct, more or less, the admission of the light. This Is quite simple, but it is very useful, and, I think, presents a fair example of one of the cases in which form is patentable. Curvatures and angle become of importance in plowshares, water wheels, rotary pumps, engines, and blowers; and generally in all cases, when, by change of torm, a new and useful result is produced. In the present case the result is useful; and, although the catarrhal louche is old, the present form was not thought of until applicant de- Tue decision of the Board of Examiners-in-Chief is reversed. (Signed) S. S. Fisher, Commissioner of Patents. July 13, 1869. Facts for tlie liadies. I have used my Wheeler & Wilson Sewing Machine six years without the east repairs,doing all my family gewing,consisting of coats,overcoats,pants, md vests, down to the finest of sewing, even patching old coats and pants. Beside that, I have earned six hundred dollars ($600) in the six years. I jarned thirty dollars with one needle. Give me the Wheeler & Wilson.in )reference to all others. Mrs. Lucy Dukgy. New Milford, Conn.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 21 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Decision by the Commissioner of Patents” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 21 No. 5 (), p. 76
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07311869-76b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe