Decisions Relating to Patents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Supreme Court of the United States. EVOEY V. BURT. Letters Patent No. 59,375, issued to Alexander F. Evory and Alonzo Heston, November 6, 1866, for an improvement in boots and shoes, Held to be for the manufactured article and not for the mode of producing it, and declared to be invalid for want of patent-able novelty. A mere carrying forward or more extended application of an original idea--a mere improvement in degree--is not invention. Where certain parts of a water-tight shoe were old, a simple change in the form and arrangement of such parts, subserving the same purpose as like parts of shoes constructed under earlier patents and without causing any new function to be performed, does not constitute invention.

SA Supplements Vol 29 Issue 742suppThis article was published with the title “Patents” in SA Supplements Vol. 29 No. 742supp (), p. 181
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03221890-11862dsupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe